Gradient

Tarbell aims to distribute at least $10M in funding by the end of 2027 to support ambitious journalism on AI.

Tarbell now offers institutional grants of $50K-$500K+ directly to outlets to build their AI reporting capacity. Applications for this round close on December 11, 2026.

Apply now

Tarbell now offers institutional grants of $50K-$500K+ directly to outlets to build their AI reporting capacity. Applications for this round close on December 11, 2026.

Apply now

  • Overview
  • Who are grants for?
  • Focus areas
  • Case studies
  • FAQ
  • Apply

Overview

As artificial intelligence grows more influential, the companies building it and the policymakers regulating it warrant the kind of scrutiny that journalism exists to provide. We believe rigorous, independent reporting serves the public interest—demystifying technical developments, following the money, and documenting what happens when these systems enter the real world. 

Tarbell has supported AI journalism through reporting grants for individual stories since late 2024. Institutional grantmaking builds on that work at a larger scale.

Our newly launched Institutional Grants program provides grants of $50K-$500K+ directly to outlets to build their AI reporting capacity. We aim to distribute at least $10M in funding by the end of 2027.

We are looking to fund journalistic endeavors across one or more of eight focus areas:

  1. AI’s transformative potential
  2. AI foundational explainers and analysis
  3. Accountability reporting on frontier AI companies
  4. Investigations into AI lobbying and campaign financing
  5. AI policy coverage in the US or other priority jurisdictions such as the UK and the EU
  6. AI developments in China
  7. AI incident reporting
  8. AI and labor market impacts

Editorial Independence

Editorial independence is a core value for Tarbell and our grantees maintain complete autonomy over their reporting.
Read Tarbell’s full editorial independence policy here.

Who are institutional grants for?

The Institutional Grants program funds outlets and teams, ensuring that major newsrooms and new media ventures have the resources to pursue complex, high-stakes stories on AI. Grants via this new program will go towards funding everything from new reporting teams, investigative units, and verticals at existing outlets, to helping establish entirely new media ventures and series. Unlike our existing AI Reporting Grants program, which solicits pitches for individual stories ($1k-$20k), institutional grantmaking ($50k-$500k+) is designed for organizations and takes a more proactive approach — identifying strategic gaps in AI coverage, figuring out which outlets could close them, and providing funding to make that happen.

We will also be accepting submissions via an initial open application round which closes on December 11, 2026. As part of your application, we will ask you to describe the activities you are seeking funding for and your preferred grant duration. You will include a proposed budget, details of any existing project funding, and an overview of your proposed team and their responsibilities. Tell us about your current or projected audience and reach, and provide specific examples of the work your team would produce with the funding. Your media outlet or distribution platform must be able to accept grant funding. 

When evaluating institutional grantmaking opportunities, we look for:

Potential for Impact

We care about reporting that makes a difference. We want the journalism we enable to help society navigate the challenges ushered in by increasingly capable and widespread AI systems, whether that be by raising awareness of an underdiscussed harm or catalyzing policy change.

Reach, Influence and Experience

We prefer to fund outlets and journalists with an established and influential audience, and a track record of impressive reporting. The content produced will be read, heard, or viewed widely, and by people with decision-making power.

The Counterfactual

We prioritize supporting journalism that is unlikely to be produced otherwise, rather than work that would happen anyway.

Feasibility

We will only fund proposals that have a realistic chance of succeeding at meeting their stated aims.

Viewpoint Diversity

We support journalism across diverse perspectives, including work that challenges our own assumptions, because we believe the best ideas emerge through rigorous debate rather than consensus.

If you have any questions about the application process, please contact grants@tarbellcenter.org.

Apply now

focus areas

We understand that an outlet, newsroom department, or series focused on AI may span a few areas. We will look to fund outlets, departments, and series that predominantly cover one or more of the following topics:

AI's transformative potential

Coverage that seriously engages with the possibility that AI matching or surpassing human capabilities across most cognitive tasks could be developed in the coming years, and what this would mean for society. This is a contested and uncertain topic — which makes high-quality journalism about it especially valuable. We support diverse perspectives here, including work that challenges our own assumptions or presents evidence that cuts against prevailing narratives in either direction.

AI's foundational explainers and analysis

Explanatory journalism and analysis that educates and informs key decision-makers about AI development and deployment. This includes reporting on factors driving AI progress (such as the semiconductor supply chain, AI adoption rates, and export controls), current AI capabilities, and technical explainers of important research developments. We believe that increasing the density of accurate and reliable information in the public media on these topics leads to better-informed decisions by policymakers, companies, and civil society.

Accountability reporting on frontier AI companies

Accountability reporting on voluntary safety commitments, internal practices, and corporate behavior at leading AI companies (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, xAI, and others). Without binding government regulation in most jurisdictions, society currently relies on these companies following through on voluntary safety commitments. Journalism can play a key role in ensuring these commitments are upheld — and in surfacing cases where they aren’t, such as companies releasing models that don’t meet their own stated safety thresholds, or failing to follow through on resource commitments to safety teams.

Investigations into AI lobbying and campaign financing

Investigations into how AI companies and other relevant actors influence policy in key jurisdictions, including at the federal and state level in the US, as well as in other influential jurisdictions like the UK and EU. Lobbying and campaign spending significantly shape policy outcomes in other domains, and early evidence suggests AI is no exception. Investigative reporting can help ensure that AI governance is shaped by public interest considerations rather than by which actors spend the most on lobbying.

AI policy coverage in the US and other priority
jurisdictions like the UK and EU

Reporting that deeply engages with proposed AI policies in the US at the federal level and in key states, the potential impacts these policies could have on innovation and safety, and the surrounding dynamics shaping them. While we prioritize the US, we will also consider policy reporting proposals in other jurisdictions that are influential on AI policy, such as the UK and the EU. We believe high-quality AI policy coverage should reflect a wide range of political perspectives, including perspectives that are currently underrepresented. Sustained journalistic engagement with the policy process can improve outcomes — for example, EU policy reporters’ multi-year coverage of the continent’s AI Act is widely seen as having improved the final legislation.

AI developments in China

China is likely the second most important jurisdiction in AI development, but Western media coverage often lags behind or focuses narrowly on US-China competition rather than substantive developments. Important coverage gaps include: internal perspectives from Chinese AI and security institutions, the impacts of AI diffusion in Chinese society, technical advancements at Chinese AI companies and their global implications, and the state of US-China dialogue on AI safety and governance.

 

AI incident reporting

Reporting that surfaces real-world harms or near-harms from deployed AI systems, especially those related to catastrophic risks or major societal disruptions. Many AI incidents — such as the OpenAI-Hugging Face hack — are poorly understood even by employees at frontier AI companies, who often first learn about the impacts through media reporting. A strong cadre of reporters covering this beat could uncover early evidence of societal impacts from AI, helping decision-makers identify and respond to warning signs before they escalate.

AI and labor market impacts

Reporting that generates new evidence on how AI is — or isn’t — reshaping work. As AI capabilities expand, there is intense debate but limited rigorous evidence about the actual impact on employment, wages, and the nature of work. We’re particularly interested in reporting that goes beyond speculation and anecdote to provide data-driven analysis of labor market changes as they unfold.

Case Studies

NPR’s Power and Influence team

NPR’s Power and Influence team reports on how technology intersects with power, money, politics and influence. Bringing decades of combined experience, this team leads NPR’s coverage of frontier AI across radio, podcast, and digital platforms. Tarbell has awarded the team a grant of $250,000 to support its coverage.

“AI is an increasingly central storyline on many of the beats we’re covering at NPR. We’re working hard to inform our audience how the technology works, the ways in which it’s affecting their lives and the ways in which it’s remaking the world. We’re thrilled to have Tarbell’s support to help us cover AI with even more ambition and depth.”

– Brett Neely, Supervising Senior Editor, NPR

 

NPR

Machine Gods

Machine Gods is a new video-first show from Casey Newton and Kevin Roose, the creators of the hugely successful New York Times podcast Hard Fork, and two of the most recognized names in AI journalism today. The twice-weekly show, launching in partnership with NPR in October, will combine sharp news, expert analysis, and high-impact interviews with the builders and thinkers shaping the AI future. Applying journalistic rigor to both the promise and perils of the technology, Machine Gods will bring independent reporting on frontier AI companies directly to millions of viewers and listeners on YouTube, major podcast platforms, and public radio station feeds—completely free and non-paywalled. Tarbell is proud to support their launch with a grant of $480,000.

“We are longtime admirers of Tarbell’s mission of funding high-quality AI journalism, and we’re thrilled to be a Tarbell grantee. Tarbell’s support will help us scale our show quickly, experiment with new formats, and bring more grounded, independent AI reporting into the world at a time when it’s critically needed.”

– Kevin Roose, Co-host, Machine Gods

 

Frequently asked questions

Apply
When can I apply?

Our grants team will primarily take a proactive approach to identifying potential grantees, but we have also opened an application round that will close on December 11, 2026. We will not be able to evaluate every application that we receive and will only conduct a formal evaluation for proposals we are very likely to fund.

How many journalists are required to be in my newsroom or group to be eligible?

We do not have a minimum number of journalists required. If you are an individual reporter looking for funding, please visit our Individual Reporting Grants page.

Do you have a media outlet preference?

We look forward to receiving grant applications from media outlets of varying size, from different geographies and across the political spectrum. Through our fellowship and reporting grant programs we have worked with a number of different media outlets including Bloomberg, CBS News, CNBC, the Dispatch, Fortune, the Guardian and MIT Technology Review, among others.

Program
What is the duration of your grants?

While we establish the program we will mostly be issuing 1-year grants, but we expect 2-year+ grants to become the default once the program is better established.

Is there any editorial oversight?

Successful grant applicants have full editorial control over their content and must adhere to their own media outlet’s editorial standards. Tarbell has no control or oversight of content and strictly adheres to its editorial guidelines.

Funding
Who is funding this?

Tarbell’s Institutional Grants program is generously supported by our donors . Our donors have no involvement in any of our grant selection processes. If you’re interested in supporting the next round, you can donate here or get in touch.

How do we need to disclose funding?

Grantees will need to disclose Tarbell funding and the specific wording and format must be approved by Tarbell in advance. If you share your Tarbell-funded story with other outlets for co-publication, grantees must request that they also include this disclosure.

Ask
Don't see your question here? Ask us.
Thank you!
Your message has been sent. We will contact you as soon as possible

Applications for funding under Tarbell’s Institutional Grants program close on December 11, 2026.